Let’s make an analogy. Would anyone consider it appropriate to answer yes to the following?
because it puts a biased and harmful opinion (that of the question),
It is not possible to take both ideas, the one expressed in the question of analogy, which is biased, harmful and unfounded, as equal and put it on the same level as one of the fundamental principles of the Charter of Human Rights.
(which is “cured” by studying), or from the worst of the malice of those who,
The media, using all sorts of subterfuges and stratagems to distort the evidence, appeal to absurd conspiracies, and insult the intelligence. Anything to get their benefit.
Precisely because of that malice implicit in taking advantage of the ignorance of others to manipulate, there should not be a single concession with this intellectual cancer. In a book from which people must obtain knowledge, scientific evidence gathered over centuries cannot be put on the same level as a fallacy that cannot stand up to the slightest rational analysis, and when it is seen to be dismantled, it pulls the strings of the emotional: “You’re being cheated!
Nowadays, anyone can take a camera, a polyexpan box, and a helium balloon and send it to appreciate the curvature of the Earth by itself, without any manipulation. That’s in the extreme case that the many ways to verify reality (
) were not enough for him.
Magufling, magical thinking, and malicious manipulation can be
. It’s not something to be taken as a joke. And it’s certainly not something to give